stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/501
14:44:47
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Dear Vikki,
At first, I was going to stay away from this one, but because of a single
session which became a turning point in my life, I just have to jump in.
Hope it doesn't start a ruckus. If so, I won't respond further, so the
ruckus will stop. That's not our purpose here.
At 08:33 AM 7/24/98 EDT, Gene wrote:
(snip)
>....religious sites do not lend themselves to RV.
(snip)
>.....I will simply say that viewing
>the face of what I perceived to be God is not possible for a living human
>therefore you will not be permitted to view higher than the feet of the
>Crucifixion.
---------------------------
I had once had several weeks of viewing bad guys and went to the unit
director to ask for a little relief from the heavy stuff. "You're a
soldier," he said, "suck it up and do your job." For the next two days, I
got dope lords and militant crazies as targets, but then, on the third day,
I went into the viewing room with my monitor and started the session. The
frontloading was, "The target is a person. Describe the person." I
started the session, and immediately told the monitor, "I don't know what
this guy is supposed to have done, but he didn't do it. - He's not one of
the bad guys."
The session continued, and I got very strong access to this target person.
As site contact grew, I became more and more convinced that this was not an
evil person. In fact, I became awe-stricken by the innate goodness I felt
from this guy. By the time the session was half way through, I felt like I
was glowing all over. I remember that I could feel my cheeks and hands
radiating a warm, expansive feeling. It was wonderful. I gained direct
access to this person mentally and found myself directly involved with the
most perfect human I had ever met. We continued the session together. He
was actually very lovingly helping me do my own session. I completed the
personality profile procedure and ended the session, but the glow didn't
end. In fact, it hasn't yet. That was the most wonderful session I have
ever done, and it was a changing point in my life. There was so much love
and honesty and friendliness in this person that I began to actually feel
love and a total sense of admiration for him. By the end of the session, I
felt I could love the table, the chair, the walls, the monitor, life
itself, my own existance, etc. Everything which came to my mind was seen
in a totally new light.
Then the monitor opened the envelope. Printed on the middle of the page
was one word: "Jesus".
To say that RVing God is an abuse of a God-given ability is the equivalent
of saying that praying directly to God is an abuse of prayer. There are
some sects, religions and denominations which believe that, and I guess
that they would not be able to look God or Jesus in the face. I think that
those same people probably believe that the most proper use for a ruler is
to crack the knuckles of misbehaving kids. My religious background is that
God is a loving god and a warm and welcoming father. I guess Gene will now
call me one of the smartass people, but I think that the answer you got
from Gene is more Gene than RV, just as the answer you are now getting from
me is more me than RV. When Gene approached Jesus, he couldn't go further
than to look at His feet. When I approached Jesus, I was welcomed with
total openness and love. I'm certainly no better a person than Gene is. I
have to think that the difference is one of entrenched belief systems.
The answer, then, seems to be that when we view, we bring ourselves into
the session with us. If you come into the session believing that God is
unattainable, you won't be able to view Him. If you come into the session
believing that God will welcome you, you can.
I know that one of Liam's most valued sessions was such a religious target.
In training and practice sessions in the unit, we used a lot of religious
targets. They have good, historically recorded feedback, and therefore
make good practice for viewing past events. No one that I know of ever
"fell off their chair" viewing the crucifixion or found it impossible to
view Jesus or God.
>I am a Roman Catholic and I have found that anytime I want to humble and
>smartass viewer who begins to think they know it all, I simply provide them
>Calvary on the day of the Crucifixion. I have seen Viewers so suddenly
thrown
>from their altered state.....
This comment is not about viewing religious targets, but about a much more
basic-to-CRV problem we had in the unit. There is a rule in CRV that the
viewer's subconscious has to be ultimately in charge of the session. After
all, it is supposed to be the only one in the room which has contact with
the target. The issue of "monitor control" has been around for years, and
was a constant problem throughout the unit's history. There are many who
worked as monitor only who were adamant that the monitor has to be in
absolute control of the session. The fact that those sessions always end
up in disaster or AOL-ville never phased their resolve. There were others
who were also viewers, who are just as adamant that the monitor is there to
serve the viewer's subconscious as it does its work. It is an old
argument, and you can easily tell which side I am on - and you can also
tell which side other people are on, as well.
I was never really a fervent supporter of either side of this conflict
until the first session I had with Gene as monitor. It was an ERV session.
I think that Gene had been in the unit for less than a week, and we hadn't
broken him in yet. He was still an interrogator at heart. Anyway, the
target was a foreign military leader. I had cooled down and gained the
hypnogogic state. Gene, who in spite of this story, is an excellent
monitor, eased me into the session by very quitely giving the coordinates.
Once I had accessed the man, Gene instructed me to describe him. I always
start my personality profile by gaining phyiscal descriptors. Once I have
gained full physical contact and can see the person's face clearly, I then
move on to the personality profiling procedure. It is just my way of
gaining greater site contact. (Yes, I saw the face of Jesus clearly. It
wasn't like any picture I've ever seen hanging in a church, so I didn't
recognize the face as His.) Anyway, Gene asked for a description of this
target person, and when I started describing the man's clothing, Gene
shouted at the top of his voice (or so it seemed to me in that hypnogogic
state) "DON'T GIVE ME THAT S__T!" Needless to say, after I peeled myself
off the ceiling (not physically, so don't go making stories out of it), the
session was over. No information of value came from that session.
Today, when I train viewers, I begin by telling them that the first,
absolute, and totally non-breachable rule of CRV is that "The VIEWER is and
must be in absolute and total charge of the session, and that that
authority must never be relinquished to the monitor, the trainer, the
customer, or anyone else for any reason. I teach that it is the one rule
in CRV to which there can be no exceptions.
>.....that they get tossed from the bed or sofa on which they are reclining.
C'mon, Gene. Wouldn't be some of that good ol' Irish Blarney we keep
hearing about, now would it?
BTW: Courtney once asked me what Jesus told me in that life-changing
session - what instructions He gave me. The only reply I had was that when
you're in the presence of Jesus, He doesn't have to tell you what you are
or what you must do. You know.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
working the targets?-
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/502
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
At 05:04 PM 7/24/98 EDT, Gene wrote:
>Folks need to read my posting a little closer...everyone once in a while I do
>have something of value to say...in this case, I distinctly noted that I
teach
>and monitor ERV...repeat ERV not CRV repeat CRV...got it...now read my post
>again and you will see that I noted you cannot monitor CRV by computer..but I
>am working on protocols for monitoring ERV by computer.
Thanks, Gene. That cleared up some confusion for me, too. I had read it
too quickly, I guess, and did confuse the two.
>.....I figured a PHD would
>be able to discern the single letter difference and the impact it makes on
the
>posting since the same PHD was quick enough to let me know just how important
>8% was in "scientific terms..."
I've been working on the computer too long at a time. For me, "PHD" is
getting to mean "Push Here, Dummy!" more and more these days.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Jesus crucifixion day -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/503
14:45:09
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>I thought that Joe McMoneagle was once tasked on Jesus ... (OK, so maybe he
>didn't see him, I dunno ...) All I read about was his remark: "Whatever you
>think this guy did -- he didn't do it!"
>
>Anyone know any more about this?
> -- John Burke
As mentioned in a previous message, that was my session. The monitor was a
guy who now calls himself Liam. The comment was because I had done one bad
guy after another for weeks on end, and had the STRAY CAT (AOL) that this
session was just another bad guy.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Thank you darlin . . . -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/504
14:45:30
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< For those of you who may be interested, Terri has "graduated" magna cum
laude
from my training and is not working practice targets with me so that we can
both perfect the concept of monitoring by computer... etc. etc.............
Gene ... the biggest hug and kiss to you and a Thank You,
for your kindness, PATIENCE, and generosity, and for
all of the times, where your words were my freedoms. . . . . . . . . . .
I never could have come this far without you...
Remember always..... I am your angel standing by.
~T~
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Please Invite -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/505
14:45:41
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>I will send an invite if you prefer, or you may do so (let me know by
>private
>email which you'd prefer.) However, technically, my inviting a person or
>them receiving an invite from a friend does not make much difference,
>it takes just as long to process.
>
>
Hi Gene , Steve.
While you guys were trying to decide who was going to ask her, I asked her.
She should be on the net later today.
slainte
Liam
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Please Invite -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/506
14:45:50
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>While you guys were trying to decide who was going to ask her, I asked her.
>She should be on the net later today.
Hi Liam,
I got her request to join earlier today, and she's been added to the subscriber
list. I'm not sure who I've got to thank, but she should be receiving a copy
of this message along with the rest of us.
So, whoever you are, welcome to the list! :)
Best always,
Steve.
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Red and Black Cards -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/507
14:46:05
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi Lyn,
Welcome to the list!
>>.....I figured a PHD would
>>be able to discern the single letter difference and the impact it makes
on
>>the posting since the same PHD was quick enough to let me know just
>>how important 8% was in "scientific terms..."
>I've been working on the computer too long at a time. For me, "PHD" is
>getting to mean "Push Here, Dummy!" more and more these days.
Yeah, and is part of the reason I don't ever take a claim at face-value,
whoever is saying it.. he can be a PhD with a long string of degrees,
but until I see the data, a claim is all it'll be in my books. I've been
talking about the possibility of setting up an online experiment to test psi
against various things (targets, red/black cards, etc.) The talks become kind of
political though, so the planning is are now mostly underground.. when they
surface, everyone will know about it though ;) My interest in the red/black
binary experiment was sparked by something you'd said on the Art Bell show,
actually, so I have you to thank for
getting me started down this whole route - thanks, Lyn! :)
BTW, the 8% thing. This started as a debate about the idea of setting
up an online experiment involving red and black cards. I remembered
you saying on the Art Bell Show that you'd been running an extended
experiment on it and had got so far 58.3% accuracy.. (hence the 8%
thing). Later turns out you said 68.3% and I'd misremembered the
first digit (well, two digits out of three isn't bad :), but it did kind of
change focus of the debate.. it wasn't a "mere 8.3%" but 18.3%..
Can you tell us a little more abou this experiment? Some have suggested
that in the heat of the moment, you may have misremembered from
an event long in the past.. and that in the long run you'd only get 50%
accuracy.. but I seem to recall you mentioning the red/black experiment
was recent and an extended experiment at that. Can you shed any
more light on this..?
Thanks! :-)
Best always,
Steve.
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Jesus crucifixion day -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/508
14:46:17
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>As mentioned in a previous message, that was my session. The monitor was a
>guy who now calls himself Liam. The comment was because I had done one bad
>guy after another for weeks on end, and had the STRAY CAT (AOL) that this
>session was just another bad guy.
Hi Lyn,
I remember you mentioning this on the Art Bell show. I always always
confused by the part where you said "whatever you think this guy did,
he didn't do it" - I'm glad you cleared that up, because I read that to
mean he wasn't what Christians believed him to be, that he was the son
of God (he didn't do it?). But put in context of all the bad guys you'd
had to view the weeks beforehand, I can understand why that comment
was funny now =) (He didn't commit the crime..)
Cheers,
Steve.
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Who's in Charge -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/509
14:46:29
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi Lyn and all, Liam here.
Good to see you posting again Lyn. I was concerned you might be having a
computer problem. I considered calling and offering my assistance
Chalk one more up for Sheldrake. I was getting ready to post on this
matter when I read your post below.
snip
There is a rule in CRV that the
>viewer's subconscious has to be ultimately in charge of the session. After
>all, it is supposed to be the only one in the room which has contact with
>the target. The issue of "monitor control" has been around for years, and
>was a constant problem throughout the unit's history. There are many who
>worked as monitor only who were adamant that the monitor has to be in
>absolute control of the session. The fact that those sessions always end
>up in disaster or AOL-ville never phased their resolve. There were others
>who were also viewers, who are just as adamant that the monitor is there to
>serve the viewer's subconscious as it does its work. It is an old
>argument, and you can easily tell which side I am on - and you can also
>tell which side other people are on, as well.
>
snip
This topic came up on P J 's web. The military folks , you, Gene, Paul, Joe,
and Greg, and everyone else in the world, believed the Viewer was in charge
of the session. Like all Irishmen, I am peace loving and abhor a fight. I
therefor did not chip in. An RV team is like a marriage, nobody is really
in charge (I can comfortably say that I am in charge in my marriage. I can
say that because I am comfortable in my masculinity, I am a natural born
leader and should logically be in charge, and because Sandy has gone on a
trip to Paris and I can delete this before she gets back). The rule that
the viewer is in charge is like the rule that the husband is in charge. I
think this is a very good rule, but it is unenforceable. Just ask any
husband who has stumbled home at 3 AM singing Irish ballads, with Guinness
on his breath and been meant at the door by a crazy Indian woman, who
refuses to buy my, I mean his, very plausible explanation that he was just
doing cultural research into his ethnic roots. This, of course, has never
happened to me, but I have heard stories. Ask yourself this; You have two
people in a room. One is intelligent clear eyed and firm of jaw. The other
one's eyes are glazed over. The person looks like he just went 15 rounds
with Ali and Mike Tyson and they let Ali and Tyson bring baseball bats into
the ring. This person cannot spell RV and if the person walks out in the
middle of the session, you will have to put a leash on him to keep him from
wandering into traffic and being hit by a truck. Well Liam, I chose the
idiot. You know the guy who just misspelled his own name at the top of the
paper. If that is the case I would like to enlist you into the 7th Cav and
you can follow Custer down into that valley.
Have you ever heard a viewer say "Hey. I must be door knobing. Why don't
you move me 30 meters straight up or 50 meters to the South. Or how about
"I must be in AOL drive. I bet those last four pages are just a bunch of
crap. Viewers will at times, when left on their own, avoid the mutilated
body of the child under the bushes by the river and tell you in great detail
about the river and the various types of fish swimming in it. Viewers can
at times spend the whole session describing a park, with flowers, trees, and
birds, instead of walking out of the park, crossing the street, going into
the building, down the stairs into the room where the poor bastard (who is
the target of the session) is having electrodes attached to various parts of
his body.
When the monitor gives the viewer the chance to pick out some words to S5 I
get a comfortable feeling when the viewer says "I FEEL this is important but
I have no idea why" The opposite of that is when the viewer says " I THINK
the AOL of ice cream cone is important because I KNEW I was in a jungle and
ice cream cones would be hard to come by.
IMO, no one is really in charge of the session (or a marriage). It is
disciplined anarchy (try explaining that to General Odom). This worked well
at Ft Meade, with the exception of a few individuals. For the most part; if
it has to do with the signal line, instinct, or gut feeling, the viewer will
call the shots. If it has to do with logic, structure, or support to the
session (setting up, getting coffee, etc) the monitor is responsible. RV
works best when the Viewer does not think, and the monitor does not feel.
There are two people in the room, but there is only one brain, and it does
not belong to the one person who is in contact with the site.
slainte
May the force be with you.
Liam
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Jesus crucifixion day -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/510
14:46:38
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Re: [stargate] Jesus crucifixion day
courtny brouwn in his book cosmic voyage he has some session with jesus he
meet him and talk to him but what he
writes in the book is over my head...
Eyal
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Please Invite/Hi, I am here :-) -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/511
14:46:50
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi there :-)
I almost feel treaded like a VIP, getting invitations etc. LOL. Thank you,
Steve, for processing my request to be subscribed so quickly.
I am very excited to be on that list and look forward to get to know the list
members and to learn and listen. Hopefully I will be able to contribute to your
discussions (I am not a frequent writer though, I always think I have nothing
important to say).
Wishing you all a very nice day,
Love and respect
Monika
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
working the targets? -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/512
14:47:01
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<<
As for the fact that Gene then continues to say that he has been developing
a protocol for monitoring over an email connection, I stand totally confused.
>>
Using the ERV method ONLY..old pardnah..ERV only....CRV will not computer on
computers....
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/513
14:47:13
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Re: [stargate] Figure eights
All of Lyn's comments are very interesting "from his perspective"..I would
note that no one in our unit EVER looked into the face of God. I do not base
that on my personal experience but a detailed review of sessions - each
session had a complete report written on the events of the session. I am sure
Lyn believes he looked into the face of God but that would of course make him
the only living human being who ever has. In fact, like most of our viewers,
viewing of religious personages or artifacts was wrought with personal
emotional descriptions but as noted by Lyn, "it was a face like no other" and
even today he cannot describe it...No one ever could. As to falling out of a
chair or bed...there were actually several cases of viewers falling from
chairs on different high emotion topics. Viewers often attempted to get up
after a session and walked into walls or doors....but as a Viewer, Lyn would
not know that...it was an item that was discussed with other Monitors and Skip
Atwater only..Lyn as a Viewer actually believed he had totally access to
everything that was going on in the sessions but in fact Viewers were
routinely excluded from most of the information to a number of reasons, not
the least of which..it was good protocol. Viewer's are in fact the central
point of the session and in the CRV technology they are most certainly in
charge. But in the ERV form of remote viewing, something, like a number of
our viewers, Lyn was not able to work every efficiently, the Monitor is most
definitely in charge...The viewer in the hynogogic state is just barely able
to control their bowels let alone a session. Their state of mind is totally
right brain and with the right brain in control, there is not control Without
an effective monitor, you have a child with an unlimited credit card in the
Mall.."ooohhh..lookee here...oooohh what is that....ooooohhh I wanna do
that..." etc...Lyn is absolutely most positively correct in his comments as
they relate to CRV (with the exception of viewers actually falling over their
chairs on certain targets)....but as to his comments on ERV protocols, early
on he was judged by Skip and myself as not really ready for that technique and
why should we waste our time since he was doing quite well in ERV..For those
of you who may not have known...I was the Monitor for all ERV sessions and Ed
Dames was the Monitor for CRV Sessions although I was also called upon at
least a half a dozen times a week to do Monitoring of CRV sessions...just to
hone my skills in both...
As to me ever ever ever using profanity in a session or "yelling" at a
Viewer...Lyn may actually believe that happened since viewers did often come
away with session comments on what happened only to find the tape recordings
and sometimes the video proved them wrong. Lyn was never yelled at by me..
and in fact, according the the files, I had less than a dozen sessions with
Lyn during my two year career with the unit....like I said, I was chief of the
ERV Team and Lyn was not on my Team. I would only enter the CRV room with him
on a very infrequent basis...But I can assure Lyn, if he has been harboring
this trauma all these years, I never ever never yelled at a viewer, or used
profanity of any sort in a session or I would have been soundly reprimanded by
Skip or other bosses.
No one should interpret this as a schism or disagreement between Lyn and
myself since we have shared a world only a few people in the world have ever
known and for this reason have bonded in a way no one can understand. Lyn has
given me missions to work from his "other job" and we stay in contact
(although I have missed him for about two months now)...We planted flowers and
vegetables in a makeshift garden at the old unit and shared many a story when
things were slow. Nope, no disagreement here...just pulling away some of the
cobwebs that form over the years on both of our memories..
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Who's in Charge -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/514
14:47:29
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Re: [stargate] Who's in Charge
Thanx Liam...I do not know how you did it but you actually explained it better
than I did in my answer to Lyn....are you on the wagon again...it is usually
on those rare infrequent periods of time that you actually come up with clear
concise thoughts...You are, as noted correct, it is a marriage of a individual
who is quite capable of walking off a cliff for as much as a couple hours
after a session and a well dressed and soft spoken debonair and sophisticated
Monitor who has absolutely not idea what you folks are talking about during
your sessions...in the end the marriage works and somehow a target gets
exploited and reportod upon in a way that satisfied the brass...Nothing has
changed...I am still handsome, well dressed, debonair and sophisticated and
you still walk into walls and fall off the bed during sessions...but then you
do that out of session also...oh well....
Slainte ... and pray for peace in Ireland...
Gene...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Jesus crucifixion day -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/515
14:47:37
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<<
courtny brouwn in his book cosmic voyage he has some session with jesus he
meet him and talk to him but what he
writes in the book is over my head...
>>
There was lots over Courtney's head also...comets, little grey men and other
astral wonders...sheeezzzz...please folks, review Courtney's work like you
would compare Communism to to Capitalism..one works and the other does not....
Gene...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Please Invite/Hi, I am here :-) -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/516
14:47:48
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Re: [stargate] Please Invite/Hi, I am here :-)
Yeaaaaa..Whistle..whoop...hurrah....Monika is here....
Hi Moni...glad to have you aboard...
Gruesse aus Washington...
Eugen...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/517
14:47:58
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> All of Lyn's comments are very interesting "from his perspective"..I would
> note that no one in our unit EVER looked into the face of God.
Funny thing about being a renegade meditator - especially where you
don't know enough not to do something. I once decided to try looking into
the face of God. I saw thousands of different faces looking back at me.
had to figure that was as good as it gets
-Deb
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Jesus crucifixion day -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/518
14:48:24
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Dear friends,
Thank you very much to everybody for your very personal contributions to that
special topic.
Curran2106@... wrote:
> See I TOLD YOU!!!...nobody believes the old elephants...oh well..Ya'll have a
> good time...sheeezzzz...
> Gene......
> ----
Gene, I like the idea of "old elephants" : very peaceful vegetarian species,
in
a wise period of their life, with an excellent long term memory ;-)
Liam you wrote:
> In approximately 1986, Skip Atwater worked me on this site as a practice
> site. We worked it single blind. Skip, the monitor, knew what the site
> was. I worked blind. Gene acknowledges Skip as the greatest monitor in the
> world. At the time I had been involved in remote viewing eight hours a day,
> five days a week for approximately three years, Paul and I were doing the
> majority of the viewing for the project. Not trying to brag, just trying to
> validate we had a competent team working the site. We worked it CRV. Early
> in S4 a Tangible of Cross came in. Intangibles of sacred, somber, and a
> whole lot of very heavy, somber feeling. I focussed first on the soldiers
> guarding the site (I am a soldier at heart and find I have a lot in common
> with other soldiers, regardless of time or nationality) I also identified a
> woman at the foot of the cross, his mother. I knew there was a body on the
> cross, but I was not able to view it. . I could not pick up any of His
> last words. I did pick up his concern for his mother. I was able to pick
> up a lot of what the other people around were feeling, but as for that body
> on the cross.....it was beyond me (I did have a distinct impression however;
> that He was Irish).
>
> Now, I may be just another superstitious Irishman, but like Gene, I believe
> that God (anybody's God) is unviewable. Jean Luc, I cannot imagine what
> difference it makes if Christ was short, tall, fat, or thin (I already told
> you he was Irish, so you know he was good looking). I have no problem with
> anyone trying to view the crucifixion. I just do not believe you will have
> a whole lot of success in viewing Christ. It has been my experience in
> life,
> that God is not in the business of satisfying my curiosity.
Thank you very much, Liam, for your very interesting flash-back to the mili
unit.
It's the first time I got these infos. BTW I've met Skip in his lab and agree
with you for what concerns him. Then à propos the cross, I like you to give us a
kind of "reverse shot" overview (as they say in the cinema business). If you've
got some more elements since that session, and have some time to kill some day
I'd love to know more about the mother's and soldiers thoughts and feelings.
Concerning the Irish origin, I have some close friends too on this very nice
Island, so I have really no difficulty to understand the link :)
Lyn Buchanan wrote :
> As mentioned in a previous message, that was my session. The monitor was a
> guy who now calls himself Liam. The comment was because I had done one bad
> guy after another for weeks on end, and had the STRAY CAT (AOL) that this
> session was just another bad guy.
Hello Lyn, nice to hear from you on this list. You've told me this very personal
story once. And it is with a real pleasure that I've re-read it, because as
others I guess on this list, I've no difficulty to imagine by empathy a part of
what you felt during this special experience. As explorer, I like your point of
view concerning the belief system consequences (with respect to Liam's and
Gene's
too). I also know you do good paintings. But don't remember if you've ever tried
to fix Jesus' face on a print. If yes, I 'd love to get a scanned photo of it.
BTW (sometimes a good picture is really better than a long talk) did the
military
RVers realistic sketches after their sessions as a complement of some rved
aspects of the target apart all the ideograms ? Joe often talks about his after
session sketches...
THX to Steve and John and Eyal too
Thanks once again to all contributors
Take care,
Jean-Luc.
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Amen! -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/519
14:48:36
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> All of Lyn's comments are very interesting "from his perspective"..I would
> note that no one in our unit EVER looked into the face of God.
Fascinating stuff...
Gene, I do believe the man said "Jesus." Not God's face. Not unless they are
both one and the same to you.
I think the Arabs were intuitive enough to realize that such a problem would
eventually condemn mankind, so they opted for letter symbol to represent God,
and
named all the prophets without the need for description.
Yes, Lyn is right about the pics all over the world depicting Jesus... that is
just an ethnocentric potrayal. I am sure you are right, though, Gene. Anyone
who
"sees" Jesus is bound to be knocked out of their chair, once they found how he
*really* looked like....
Peace
electrix
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/520
14:48:46
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< don't know enough not to do something. I once decided to try looking into
the face of God. I saw thousands of different faces looking back at me.
had to figure that was as good as it gets >>
. . . . . . hehehehe... Figures. Just took a Monroer to nail the target :-)
~T~
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Who's in Charge -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/521
14:49:31
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>at times spend the whole session describing a park, with flowers, trees, and
>birds, instead of walking out of the park, crossing the street, going into
>the building, down the stairs into the room where the poor bastard (who is
>the target of the session) is having electrodes attached to various parts of
>his body.
Hi all,
I'm still getting up to speed on the specifics of ERV, but i'm curious to know,
what the cuing method used was, when the viewer is wandering a park
instead of the (local) vicinity of the target?
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Who's in Charge -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/522
14:49:42
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi Wildfire and all;
Liam here.
Viewers can
>>at times spend the whole session describing a park, with flowers, trees,
and
>>birds, instead of walking out of the park, crossing the street, going into
>>the building, down the stairs into the room where the poor bastard (who is
>>the target of the session) is having electrodes attached to various parts
of
>>his body.
>
>Hi all,
>
>I'm still getting up to speed on the specifics of ERV, but i'm curious to
know, what the cuing method used was, when the viewer is wandering a park
instead of the (local) vicinity of the target?
>
The monitor has to think on his feet well actually while he is sitting on
his but, but then, that is why we pay them the big bucks . It would
depend on what the viewer has already identified at the site and also
perhaps if the viewer is working ERV or CRV. Also it depends on the viewer.
A good monitor knows his viewers characteristics. But something like this is
usually effective. Excellent job of describing the park (viewers have very
fragile egos and must be pampered) now describe the structure. or Wonderful
job describing the park. What else is at site? The monitor MUST never say
You C***** S**t SOB get out of the bloody park and into the D***
interrogation room.
slainte
May the force be with you
Liam
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Amen! -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/523
14:49:56
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<<
Gene, I do believe the man said "Jesus." Not God's face. Not unless they
are
both one and the same to you.
>>
According to Christian doctrine, and the concept of the Holy Trinity...God,
the father and the son and the Holy Ghost are one...my belief and I am stuck
with it...
Gene..
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Who's in Charge -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/524
14:50:13
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<<
I'm still getting up to speed on the specifics of ERV, but i'm curious to
know, what the cuing method used was, when the viewer is wandering a park
instead of the (local) vicinity of the target?
>>
Easy...tell the viewer they hvae given enough environmentals..now "go to the
place I want you to go and tell me about it"...then the magic takes over...
Gene..
stargate : Message: [stargate]
the BBS -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/525
14:50:21
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi everybody,
Steve has provided us with two BBS for our use. One is to discuss
remote viewing and psi. The other is a general, open discussion forum.
Lately people have not been posting much to either board. Then what was
posted gets rolled off the board, leaving it looking deserted and dead.
I want to encourage each of us to think of the boards and possibly use
them or I am afraid Steve will shut them down from humble neglect. Come
one people -- what do you say? If they are of value, let's use them. If
not, we will have to let them die. Surely there are listmembers out there
who would like to discuss dreams and dream interpretation with me. Let's
get something going. Let's pick a topic and get into it.
Okay, enough of my cheerleading. I hope to see you on the board.
Jane
stargate : Message: [stargate]
a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/526
14:50:32
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi,
It's me again. I thought of a topic for the BBS. I would like to hear
about The Monroe Institute programs and the cool experiences of the
participants. From what I hear, it is awesome.
So what do you say Terri, Deb, Floyd, and Electrix? Care to get a
discussion started?
Jane
----
stargate : Message: [stargate]
a Monroe topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/527
14:50:40
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi,
It's me again. I thought of a topic for the BBS. I would like to hear
about The Monroe Institute programs and the cool experiences of the
participants. From what I hear, it is awesome.
So what do you say Terri, Deb, Floyd, and Electrix? Care to get a
discussion started?
Jane
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/528
14:50:53
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> about The Monroe Institute programs and the cool experiences of the
> participants. From what I hear, it is awesome.*******************************
Sorry folks, computer foul up caused me to send out the same message
twice. Sorry to clutter up your mailbox. Jane
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/529
14:51:03
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
I took the Gateway Program in March and would be happy to discuss the
program.
Angela
bake27 wrote:
>
> Hi,
> It's me again. I thought of a topic for the BBS. I would like to hear
> about The Monroe Institute programs and the cool experiences of the
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Monroe experience -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/530
14:51:16
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi everybody!
I started a thread on the RV/Psi BBS about the Monroe Experience. The
question for the board, not the list, is has the Monroe program(s) helped
you in your RVing? Would you recommend it for those who want to RV?
Jane
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/531
14:51:24
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Ok..the gauntlet is tossed...how tell the rest of us about the "Monroe
Experience"...hahahaha
Gene...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/532
14:51:43
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi: I have the Gateway series on cd...like to use it when I travel. Still
working back and forth through Wave I to III. Just haven't spent much
time in IV to VI for some reason, although I did go through the whole set
in order when I first got it. I can't compare it to actually attending
the Institute program, since I haven't been there. I may do that some
day, but I think I'd rather do a complete rv course first. take care,
Bill
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Transfer psychic healing discussion to [stargate] a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/533
14:51:58
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hello Bevy and Gene,
I am transfering the interesting discussion we had about psychic healing
on the psi-list to the stargate psi/rv bbs. I think it might stimulate
further interesting discussion on the topic. But first I would like your
permission to repost your parts of the discussion.
Regards,
Bill Pendergrass
( not so pushy Ph.D.)
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Transfer psychic healing discussion to [stargate] a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/534
14:52:10
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
I am transfering the interesting discussion we had about psychic healing
on the psi-list to the stargate psi/rv bbs. I think it might stimulate
further interesting discussion on the topic. But first I would like your
permission to repost your parts of the discussion.
Regards,
>>
whatever...
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Sightings On The radio RV on Wednesday -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/535
14:52:21
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Sightings On The Radio will have a guest named Don Bradley
to talk about Remote Viewing during WW2. Does anyone know who
Don Bradley is? Rv & WW2 ??
Rich
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/536
14:52:30
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Edith:
I've been away for a bit and just tuned into this discussion of figure
eights. I've had them occur for me, but only in my sketches. When I find
myself drawing them, I have almost a compulsion to trace the figure eight
line over and over again so it ends up being quite black.
I'm one who was trained in SRV and we were given the standardized ideograms.
(I know, I know! Anathema to CRV'ers.) The "loop " still remains a "life
form" for me. The figure eight -- much rarer in my sessions -- seems to be
a *completion* of the loop.
During some sessions when I've gotten a figure eight, I've perceived an
unmistakable message: "This one is dead."
Thinking my experience with the figure eight during a session was very
particular to me, I was a bit startled to read your message.
Rick Stordeur
Vancouver Island
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
The Monroe Institute topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/537
14:52:48
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> I took the Gateway Program in March and would be happy to discuss the
> program.
>
> Angela
>
Nice to hear from you again.
So you did it finally :)
Did you enjoy ? Have you met Joe McMoneagle ? Did he give a lecture on
remote viewing ?
What about the CHEC Units ? Did you appreciate them ? Did you meet Skip ? Do
you like the Hemi-sync tapes cool down system ?
BTW thank you very much for your post concerning RV on preprinted forms ;-).
Warm regards,
And.......see you in 12
Jean-Luc
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Transfer psychic healing discussion to [stargate] a bbs topic -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/538
14:53:00
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
which discussion?
Bevy
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/539
14:53:14
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hello all,
Has it occurred to anyone besides me that this whole topic
of ideograms and symbolism .. and the Rhine ESP cards .. and
the [possible?] existence of a basic vocabulary for reporting
RV experiences .. might somehow relate to Jung's archetypes ?
Or, to some other semantic/symbolic realm that might be
surveyed in (say) Joseph Campbell's books ?
Just wondering, possibly talking thru my hat, value $0.02.
Fred Baube
--
F.Baube(tm) * "It is the geek's modern task [..] to
G'town U. MSFS '88 * make enterprises function in spite of
fred@... * the blockheads who own and control them."
+358 (40) 737 6934 * -- an article at www.wired.com
#include
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Sightings On The radio RV on Wednesday -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/540
14:53:28
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> Sightings On The Radio will have a guest named Don Bradley
> to talk about Remote Viewing during WW2. Does anyone know who
> Don Bradley is? Rv & WW2 ??
>
> Rich
>
www.don-bradley.com
he seems to be a Science Fiction New Age writer of sorts. I remember
from his posts at the PSI TECH bb, months ago, he came in demanding an
interview with Ed Dames to "set the record straight", and said he
would go on Sightings and attack Ed Dames if he did not comply or
answer his questions
I personally thought it strange he felt compelled to be Ed's mouthpiece.
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Sightings On The radio RV on Wednesday -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/541
14:53:51
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>>www.don-bradley.com
he seems to be a Science Fiction New Age writer of sorts. I remember
from his posts at the PSI TECH bb, months ago, he came in demanding an
interview with Ed Dames to "set the record straight", and said he
would go on Sightings and attack Ed Dames if he did not comply or
answer his questions
I personally thought it strange he felt compelled to be Ed's mouthpiece.<<
I don't know who Don Bradley is but I just finished watching a History Channel
program on prophesy and it seems there were mutual disinformation projects on
the part of Germany and Britain involving Nostradamus's quatrains. It seems
Goebels and the Brits were rewriting Nostradamus's predictions to further the
war effort and some leafleting was done.
I suppose in light of that revelation there may have been attempts at psychic
espionage or prediction of outcomes in operations. The behind the scenes work
on the part of the allies and Germany probably involved any attempt to gain an
advantage in the intelligence or propaganda arenas. So, it doesn't seem all
together unlikely that such efforts took place.
Hitler's personal astrologer, a gentleman by the name of Kraft, ended up dying
in Buchenwald after he pissed Hitler off.
Regards,
Ken Schlueter
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/542
14:54:01
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
F.Baube(tm) wrote:
> Has it occurred to anyone besides me that this whole topic
> of ideograms and symbolism .. and
> the [possible?] existence of a basic vocabulary for reporting
> RV experiences .. might somehow relate to Jung's archetypes ?
Yes it has. I have studied Jung's work extensively. Although, just as in
dream interpretation, one must be aware that any symbol, though
it may indeed have archetypal and cultural significance in its broader
range of meaning, it primarily needs to be interpreted in terms of
the personal language of meaning in order to find it's application
within the individual's life. Only when one cannot fathom a personal
meaning do you then head for the larger canvas of meaning.
In dream work the personal meaning is easily evident on most
occasions. In RV, just as in dreamwork, I would imagine we
will profit most by sticking close to our home base of personal meaning.
The figure eight symbol discussion was one I was interested in as I had
a dream once in which my ex-husband's aunt was showing me a painting
she had done with the figure in it. In the dream there were two
paintings:
one large and one small: but the same painting. As was my habit I took
the image I was shown in the dream and painted it myself.
You can see it here: http://www.active-stream.com/ASCmed/med9.html
Also in the dream it was Christmas Eve and the family was
gathered at my ex's mother's home. I was very close to this aunt...
I had helped to care for her as she was elderly and lived alone.
There were two people in the family that I missed as a result of
the divorce and she was one of them. Two years later she died
on Christmas Eve.
Shelia
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/543
14:54:11
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Aloha Fred,
The possibility of a basic vocabulary for reporting RV experiences is a
concept of some merit. Although not a fan of Jung, I do understand the
basic interpretive nature common to humans. There are like experiences
among us and being intelligent we read the signs and attempt to reproduce
our knowing by aligning our idea of the cause and effect. In the case of
Ideograms, one viewer's water sign is another's Ideo for energy flow.
The viewer wanting to determine exactly what the sub is telling them via
the ideogram production should submit viable session work for third party
evaluation of what constitutes their ideo library.
Learning and attempting to execute some other persons idea of what an
Ideogram is will not be very productive in the long run. Bad habits
generated from practice of ideograms leads to familiar motions and
preferred motions.
The idea that the shape of the Ideogram in someway is related to the target
may or may not resolve out for all viewers. In the viewers that shape does
value out to be representative of target gestalt there is a good chance a
library can be established for that viewer. This library may in-fact change
with time and amount of targets worked.
So many clues in this world, its good to see so many minds trying to sort
it all out.
Aloha ... Glenn
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/544
14:54:26
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>Just wondering, possibly talking thru my hat, value $0.02.
Actually, Ingo indicates that it was from his study of Warcollier. Good
observation.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Monroe experience -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/545
14:54:40
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> I started a thread on the RV/Psi BBS about the Monroe Experience. The
>question for the board, not the list, is has the Monroe program(s) helped
>you in your RVing? Would you recommend it for those who want to RV?
I went to Monroe's military version of the Gateway course (slightly
different orientation, but basically the same course). It was a personal
highlight for me. However, aside from using it to "chill down" before a
session (which I rarely do because the database shows that I tend to get a
lower score when I do), I don't think there is a way to use the hemisync
tapes during a session. Some people have tried having them play in the
background, but have reported that they didn't notice any difference in the
work, and the database didn't show a significant difference.
Does the Monroe course help you do remote viewing? Most people I have
talked to who have been to it report that it doesn't.
Would I recommend the Monroe course in spite of that? In a heartbeat. It
is one of the truely "worth-it" courses you can get these days.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/546
14:55:02
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
At 10:03 AM 7/25/98 EDT, Gene wrote:
>All of Lyn's comments are very interesting "from his perspective"..I would
>note that no one in our unit EVER looked into the face of God.
The target wasn't God. It was the human being, Jesus. I saw a human face
- not too Irish looking, I might add. :-}
>.......I do not base
>that on my personal experience but a detailed review of sessions - each
>session had a complete report written on the events of the session.
I think that you are right about God never being given as a target. There
is no historical record which would serve as acceptable feedback.
Therefore, it wouldn't have been given. However, I might add that the unit
didn't begin and end with your time there. There were other times to which
you didn't have any access to the records. I was there up until about a
year from the end of the project. If you had access to those records, the
CIA wants to talk to you about a long stay in prison. I can tell you that
the target of "God" was NOT given in that time frame, either. Whether it
was given after I left, I don't have a way to know. BTW: I had all
sessions in my database which had been done previous to both your and my
arrival at the unit. Many of those sessions had been shredded, and you
never got to see the records for them. However, I never saw "God" as a
target in any of the sessions done previous to our separate arrivals in the
unit.
>.....I am sure
>Lyn believes he looked into the face of God but that would of course make him
>the only living human being who ever has.
Again, please read carefully. It was a Jewish man - a historical figure
named "Jesus". While I do believe that he was God incarnate and part of
the Holy Trinity, you should know how specific the subconscious mind can be
when it comes to tasking. I was there to do a personality profile on a
person. The frontloading was, "The target is a PERSON". I was tasked with
Jesus, not God. I viewed Jesus, not God.
>..... In fact, like most of our viewers,
>viewing of religious personages or artifacts was wrought with personal
>emotional descriptions but as noted by Lyn, "it was a face like no other" and
>even today he cannot describe it...No one ever could.
Who said I can't describe it? I can still get the image I saw very
clearly. I know, I know... then I must have been off target, right? I
must have been actually viewing Joey Schmedlap. He's a very nice guy, too.
>.... As to falling out of a
>chair or bed...there were actually several cases of viewers falling from
>chairs on different high emotion topics. Viewers often attempted to get up
>after a session and walked into walls or doors.
Actually, there was one session where I did almost fall out of the chair
because of the vibrations I felt (from the site, not in the room). I had
to hang on for dear life. Falling out of a chair and being "thrown from a
bed" are somewhat different to me, though.
>......but as a Viewer, Lyn would not know that...
Excuse me?
>......it was an item that was discussed with other Monitors and Skip
>Atwater only..Lyn as a Viewer actually believed he had totally access to
>everything that was going on in the sessions but in fact Viewers were
>routinely excluded from most of the information to a number of reasons, not
>the least of which..it was good protocol.
That is true. What you are forgetting (never really knew about) was that I
was the Database Manager, and after all those meetings to which I, as
Viewer, was not involved (rightfully so - it IS good protocol), I then had
to type in all notes and comments into the database and other computer
records. Many of the things I had access to, I shouldn't have had. That's
a factor of working in a very small office where everyone wears many hats.
As viewer, I wasn't privy to those things which I, as Database Manager, was
required to see. Many times, I would put data entry off because in their
infinite wisdom, one of the monitors would hand me a summary to type into
the computer for a session on a target I was about to do. I was handed all
the critiques on everyone's work (even my own), and was required to see
even a lot of the things about the projects that I REALLY didn't want to
know. I know that you like to think that the monitors were infinitely
superior to the viewers, and that nobody knew as much as you, but that just
wasn't so.
>.....Viewer's are in fact the central
>point of the session and in the CRV technology they are most certainly in
>charge.
>
>But in the ERV form of remote viewing, something, like a number of
>our viewers, Lyn was not able to work every efficiently,
Beg pardon? You evidently didn't look at the records as well as you
thought you did.
>.......the Monitor is most
>definitely in charge...The viewer in the hynogogic state is just barely able
>to control their bowels let alone a session. Their state of mind is totally
>right brain and with the right brain in control, there is not control
Without
>an effective monitor, you have a child with an unlimited credit card in the
>Mall.."ooohhh..lookee here...oooohh what is that....ooooohhh I wanna do
>that..." etc...Lyn is absolutely most positively correct in his comments as
>they relate to CRV (with the exception of viewers actually falling over their
>chairs on certain targets)....but as to his comments on ERV protocols, early
>on he was judged by Skip and myself as not really ready for that technique
and
>why should we waste our time since he was doing quite well in ERV..
"...since he was doing quite well in ERV.." Neat freudian slip, there,
Gene. Sorry, but I was doing ERV with Skip long before you got to the
unit, and, as you say, doing quite well in it. It is true that I did
better in CRV, and that I prefer it to ERV any day. However, there are
some strengths which ERV has to complement CRV's weaknesses, and I have
worked both quite extensively. I do remember talking to Skip and telling
him that I didn't want to do ERV as long as you were the monitor. You are
right about that incident being very traumatic to me. I think Skip just
was just making a nicety for why you and I wouldn't work together.
>.....For those of you who may not have known...
>I was the Monitor for all ERV sessions and Ed
>Dames was the Monitor for CRV Sessions
It was truely a great time for the unit....
>....although I was also called upon at
>least a half a dozen times a week to do Monitoring of CRV sessions...just to
>hone my skills in both...
>As to me ever ever ever using profanity in a session or "yelling" at a
>Viewer...Lyn may actually believe that happened since viewers did often come
>away with session comments on what happened only to find the tape recordings
>and sometimes the video proved them wrong. Lyn was never yelled at by me..
>and in fact, according the the files, I had less than a dozen sessions with
>Lyn during my two year career with the unit....like I said, I was chief of
the
>ERV Team and Lyn was not on my Team. I would only enter the CRV room with
him
>on a very infrequent basis...But I can assure Lyn, if he has been harboring
>this trauma all these years, I never ever never yelled at a viewer, or used
>profanity of any sort in a session or I would have been soundly
reprimanded by
>Skip or other bosses.
It did happen at least once.. I was there.
>No one should interpret this as a schism or disagreement between Lyn and
>myself since we have shared a world only a few people in the world have ever
>known and for this reason have bonded in a way no one can understand. Lyn
has
>given me missions to work from his "other job" and we stay in contact
>(although I have missed him for about two months now)...We planted flowers
and
>vegetables in a makeshift garden at the old unit and shared many a story when
>things were slow. Nope, no disagreement here...just pulling away some of the
>cobwebs that form over the years on both of our memories..
This is true. I re-read the above comments and realize that it really does
seem like it's turning into an all-out barroom bruhaha, but hey, Gene's
Irish and I'm Scottish. I mean, it's not like I'm from Texas and he's from
Oklahoma, or something. If Gene and I didn't have something to bicker
about, the sun wouldn't rise in the morning. We would probably do our best
bickering over a Guinness, but HE's too cheap to treat, so we haven't found
out, yet.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
----
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Who's in Charge -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/547
14:56:13
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>IMO, no one is really in charge of the session (or a marriage). It is
>disciplined anarchy (try explaining that to General Odom). This worked well
>at Ft Meade, with the exception of a few individuals. For the most part; if
>it has to do with the signal line, instinct, or gut feeling, the viewer will
>call the shots. If it has to do with logic, structure, or support to the
>session (setting up, getting coffee, etc) the monitor is responsible. RV
>works best when the Viewer does not think, and the monitor does not feel.
>There are two people in the room, but there is only one brain, and it does
>not belong to the one person who is in contact with the site.
Liam,
Good comment. I agree completely, and couldn't have said it better. The
session is a marriage. However, it is a marriage with a purpose, and that
purpose is goal-oriented.
When I say that the viewer's subconscious mind has to be in charge, I don't
mean in Command. Oh, you officers are always confusing the two!!! :-)
What I mean is that the viewer's subconscious mind is the most important
"person" in the room >>>as far as the job of reaching the goal is
concerned. The viewer's conscious mind, the monitor, and everyone else in
the whole project have to all be there to see to its needs. It is like the
queen bee - it is the center of the activity, because without it, the rest
of the whole project would die off. It doesn't actually DO much except
produce, but that product is the entire purpose of everyone being there.
All the rest of the people are there as workerbees. When the session
starts and the subconscious mind gets "on target", that's what it is all
about, and everyone's job is to see that nothing gets in the way. Most of
the time, the one who gets in the way is the Viewer, him/herself. The
conscious mind wants to either/both help and/or hinder, and must be kept
out of the way. Since the viewer is usually drooling by then, that
responsibility falls to the monitor, who is in responsible for the control
of the viewer's conscious mind activities, for telling the viewer to go to
the next page instead of writing on the table, for adjusting lighting, for
control of any onlookers, for just about everything else - even his/her own
self control. Even the monitor has to stay out of the way of the viewer's
subconscious. If the monitor ever gets the thought, "Ooooh!!! I know what
the target is!!!", the monitor should leave the session.
When the monitor comes into a session thinking that the outcome of the
session, or the quality of information is up to his/her ability to control
things, then the monitor is again doing the process a disservice. When the
monitor comes into the session thinking that it's all up to his/her ability
to serve, it makes all the difference in the world.
To hear someone say that they do this or that to punish some smartass
viewer sends shivers down my spine. I have more than once thrown a monitor
out of my session for doing something like that. Perhaps saying that the
viewer is "in charge" is the incorrect way to put it, but there is a fine
point involved when I add "of the session." It is just as you said above:
>"If it has to do with the signal line, instinct, or gut feeling,
> >>>>>the viewer will call the shots.<<<<<<"
but
>"If it has to do with logic, structure, or support to the
>session (setting up, getting coffee, etc),
> >>>>the monitor is responsible.<<<<<"
There is a difference between being in charge and being in command. There
is also a difference between being in charge and being responsible for. I
guess that what I am saying about the CRV session is the same as Patton
said about rank:
"The person who is subordinate should never forget it, and the person who
is a superior should never have to remember it."
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Red and Black Cards -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/548
15:04:03
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>Can you tell us a little more abou this experiment? Some have suggested
>that in the heat of the moment, you may have misremembered from
>an event long in the past.. and that in the long run you'd only get 50%
>accuracy.. but I seem to recall you mentioning the red/black experiment
>was recent and an extended experiment at that. Can you shed any
>more light on this..?
I started off trying to do "dowsing" (CRV's form of dowsing, of course) to
get the numbers for the lottery. I don't know who hasn't tried that, and
who hasn't failed to one extent or another. There is only so far you can
take that. Then, I tried developing an ideogram for each digit, 0-9 and
working CRV sessions on it. Well, as you know, CRV's biggest embarrassment
is numbers, and that sort of carries through when trying to sneak past the
system by using ideograms, as well. It didn't work, either.
Then, I thought, "You're doing what you tell others not to do - going for
the big stuff first... start small and work your way up to it." So, I
developed an ideogram for "red" and one for "black". I take coordinates
for each card and then go through Stage I to the ideogram. It takes a lot
of time and lot of work, but >>>>after much practice<<<< I got the score up
to 68.3% dependability. That's a 6, not a 5. I have gotten very out of
practice since moving to New Mexico, but hope to take it up again soon.
BTW: the last 4 times I worked a deck (last November), the scores were:
79.4%, 77.2%, 71.7% and 69.9%.
So, sorry if someone wanted some kind of magic... it's just old fashioned
ideograms and LOTS AND LOTS of practice. It's slow, and growth and
improvement take months and months of practice, but in the end, it works.
As for "misremembered from an event long in the past", I don't remember
anything. I know that the memory is prone to errors. I log sessions into
the database when I do them and can call them up when needed. I don't have
to remember.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
multiple ideograms -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/549
15:04:15
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>Thanks for letting me share.
>Sandy
Dear Sandy,
Thanks for that. (Attempting to start a new thread here, before the old
one starts a new world war.) I find it very interesting to see what people
do to prepare for sessions. I used to try meditating, and found that it
drove me into all kinds of AOLs throughout the session. When they came up
with the idea of "spending time in sanctuary" before a session, I tried it,
and it seemed to have the same effect. I think that I was allowing myself
to think of the session before the session, and thereby ruining it for
myself.
Anyway, I finally realized that my old soapbox topic was probably what I
needed, so I started keeping records of my sessions and what I did to
prepare for them. I wanted to correlate the type of preparation with the
scores. I knew that there were also a hundred other influences which would
affect the scores, but thought that something should show up, if any
correlation existed. Sure enough, I found that I get the best results when
I line up a series of jobs and put the CRV session as one of them. In the
office, I got to where I would start all kinds of activities before a
session. Usually, you could tell when it was getting time for me to go
over and work, because I would be up and running around the office doing
things. Now, when I prepare for a session, I start out with all
deliberation and mow the lawn - work on the car - do the session - clean up
the office - fix things around the house - etc. - etc. - etc. I don't know
why I get higher results that way, but I do. Maybe it is just that I get
on a roll of accomplishing things, and that carries over into the session.
At any rate, my wife loves it.
Paul Smith likes to lie down and nap for about 30 minutes before a session.
Another viewer from the unit likes to sip some coffee and write letters
just prior to working the session. Another likes to do beadwork right
before going over to do a session (guess who that would be). All these
"rituals" actually do seem to help the accuracy of the session's results.
Not all that exciting a topic, I admit, but I find it very interesting to
hear how people prepare themselves to work. That is one part of the
process that I don't think will ever be standardized.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
working the targets? -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/550
15:04:47
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> As for the fact that Gene then continues to say that he has been developing
> a protocol for monitoring over an email connection, I stand totally
confused.
At 09:40 AM 7/25/98 EDT, Gene replied:
>Using the ERV method ONLY..old pardnah..ERV only....CRV will not computer on
>computers....
My mistake. I agree completely. CRV monitoring can't be done via computers.
I was wondering, though, how you can do ERV monitoring through email. The
monitoring process in ERV is much harder and more involved than CRV - which
is a considerable task in itself. I have always said that the monitor has
to do ten times the work the viewer has to do, and probably needs ten times
more training before becoming a "professional". I might never admit this
too loud, but I've always had more respect for the monitor's job than for
the viewer's job. I just don't see how ERV can be done over email. I'm
not asking for secrets you aren't ready to give, but if you've found a way
to do this, I would be completely amazed.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Red and Black Cards -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/551
15:04:56
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Don't forget the Powerball lottery is over $250M this week...odds are only
1:80M...should not be a statistical problem for someone in the +80% range...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
working the targets? -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/552
15:05:04
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Have trained three students to about an 85% success rate...when it is all
done..figure I need about five more students to draw good data..I will publish
it on the net and everyone , including yourself, can call me a liar again...
gene...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/553
15:05:15
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Conversation is headed into a hole...Lyn is the one who is the viewer here, I
am only a monitor...stay with his comments folks...I am obviously wrong on all
counts...those of you I have trained to do ERV...sorry, obviously I did not
know what I was doing..forget everything I taught you and so sorry about the
success rates you had...probably pure luck...check with Paul or Lyn for some
real instructions in the real way to do RV...
Gene...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
working the targets? -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/554
15:05:25
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Actually Liam / Sandy / Aquaserene / Skyemberr / Monika and more recently Dave
have all been witness to my technique...some of it in support of body searches
and commercial targets (we got paid for it)...and it seemed to work pretty
good...like I said...we got paid...
Gene...
----
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Monroe experience -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/555
15:05:35
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< Does the Monroe course help you do remote viewing? Most people I have
talked to who have been to it report that it doesn't. >>>
Hello Lyn,
My 2 cents....
Well, having completed several Monroe programs, then having Gene 'find' me
and open my eyes to the awesomeness (freedom) of remote viewing, well I can
say I will always be a Monroer first and an RVer second. I think you will find
that a Monroe grad, especially, an Explore 27 grad. will make one hell of a
knock
your socks off viewer (if one ever comes to you)
You see after spending thousands of dollars on hemi-sync tech and hundreds
of hours via hemi-sync in exploration and meditation, we are 'opened'.
Permanently. We have explored, confronted, searched, confronted, asked
questions, questioned answers, (in my case argued, I always argue till I win)
we reach out, we reach within, we reach past ... curiosity.
We are great, we are movers and shakers, we are special, we have taken the
time effort and money to become better as incarnated immortals, and to
hopefully in some way be able to help mankind or add good-ness to the
physical universe ....
Most of all we have a better than average confront (knowns) on the physical
and non physical universe. We are ready for a bigger game.
Soon, I plan 'teach' or 'pass on' what I have learned about remote viewing,
over the net, just the way Gene has taught me, with nothing altered nothing
changed. It works, its magic. (by the way my teacher is perfect)
Gene has his criteria for students, mine will be an X27 grad, and there are
really just a very, very few of us, but giving the RV skills to them will
answer
so many questions so quickly, I can feel them out there grasping.. what now?
RVing is the glittering, sparkling icing on the cake. We can
have it all. By learning RVing, on top of my Monroe experiences I have
found I can open the can of worms and NOW I can get the answers.
Without Monroe... would I have the questions?
A past target Gene had given me, well it had dead decaying-decayed
bodies at the site, but because of my Monroe experience, Lifeline program,
I found there were still entities at this site waiting to 'go on'. Their
bodies had
died, they didn't know what to do next. There is a certain eye contact
entities
make with me when they are stuck or ready to move on, when I sensed these
entities, gads they had been stuck soooo long in grief and fear, I toss the
Rving
aside and put on my Monroe hat and helped these beings on their way.
Many others have viewed this target in the past and apparently not sensed
these
beings in distress.? ? ? Without Monroe, I would have done nothing more
than just sensed the chaotic panicked energies.
Gene recently posted a dimensional target on this list, Cashel Ireland,
I and one other sent him a session, I am sure others viewed it but did
not send in... anyway I sensed and entity or being at one part of this site
on an ancient ritual ground, the being made eye contact with me, very strong
and definite, I went back to see/help him/it, this hooded clocked entity...
heheheh this being turned out to be different, not just an energy ready to
move on... this entity turned out to be me.... ROTFL.
Well, I am still there, that magic will stay at that spot come hell or high
water, (or religions) or I move on, with all my bits various pieces.
Without Robert Monroe would I even have a clue?
Did/do the Monroe programs help me as a viewer........................?
BTW... Floyd, my precious angelic dear friend (perfect creation of a male
body :-) (just had to add that) (Lifeline grad)(slept thru it) When you are
ready and have the time in your busy life, I want to share with you also, this
great magic I have learned, RVing. You will be one heck of a viewer....
now hush, you will see hahahah.
End of my 2 cents........ ~Terri~
"Life's a bowl of cherries and most poor SOBs are starving"
Auntie Mame.
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/556
15:05:57
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Re: [stargate] ideograms etc.
>Learning and attempting to execute some other persons idea of what an
>Ideogram is will not be very productive in the long run. Bad habits
>generated from practice of ideograms leads to familiar motions and
>preferred motions.
Indeed this is so. What I find a lot of beginning RV students attempting is to
'construct' an ideogram either based on their pre-session 'ESPicles' or on a set
list of whichever ideograms they have been shown and/or have handy. This
(needless to say) leads quickly to failure on the part of extracting any ideogram
data (with the exception of the "visual" ideogram, of course) and subsequent
degradation of session data from viewer morale loss.
>The idea that the shape of the Ideogram in someway is related to the target
>may or may not resolve out for all viewers. In the viewers that shape does
>value out to be representative of target gestalt there is a good chance a
>library can be established for that viewer. This library may in-fact change
>with time and amount of targets worked.
Which brings me to my point. This is very true, and a common
misunderstanding on the part of new viewers attempting to employ
protocol-based remote viewing as a structured and unyielding task-list,
instead of the real science it is. So, I shall attempt to present the data I
have gathered so-far on this ideogram issue in the hopes it will resolve
some of the questions people have. Infact, I think I shall go sofar as to
create the following:
The 3 Commandments of Ideogramology
1) There is indeed such a beast as the standard ideogram. Utilizing the same
mechanics as the '100th Monkey' paradigm, the collective unconscious will
present (to those utilizing it) a standard ideogram and/or diagrammatic archetype.
Such standard ideograms are subject to change and may or may not be the
best overall representation for it's geophysical/paraphysical source.
2) There is indeed such a beast as the non-standard ideogram. Some viewers
will never see a standard ideogram if their lives depended on it. Some will
mix and match. Regardless, there can be constructed a library for that viewer
of their own standard ideograms, which may range from one (Ingo Swann is
notorious for this), to a complete and diverse library of specialized ideograms.
3) Regardless of the above, the ideogram is not the end of the session, it is
merely another step in the process. It really should not (and as you would see,
infact does not) impact the session whatsoever if the ideogram is not even
attributable in any sense to the target being viewed. That was not the point
in creating it (see the original CRV (coordinate) materials).
I shall abbreviate the commandments here, for sake of brevity. :)
To paraphrase, the ideogram is more than a set creature, less than a totally
random beast, and just a step in the majority of structured RV processes
available. It shouldn't be made out to be as complex as some people would
have it be, nor as simple as others would in turn. It is, a completely open
arena (and apparently malleable) in the RV sciences.
(Now lets get those arguments churning)
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/557
15:06:14
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> Conversation is headed into a hole...check with Paul or Lyn for some
> real instructions in the real way to do RV...
> Gene...
hahaha! My God, you're an ornery bastard! Have you considered a
lateral to the Corps? They tell me Perris Island is beautiful this
time of year.
Greg
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Powerball -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/558
15:06:24
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< Don't forget the Powerball lottery is over $250M this week...odds are only
1:80M...should not be a statistical problem for someone in the +80% range...
>>
heh heh heh ... you are sooo cute, bit of a pisser but still ctue.
We dont have the powerball here, but play my numbers for me
3-7-11-13-23-32....... ~T~
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Monroe Institute -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/559
15:06:33
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hello All,
I attended Monroe's Gateway Program in November of 1996. I have had OBEs
since I was seventeen years old. (Now I'm 45.) And spontaneously began
remote viewing about a year later.
Given that background, I didn't know whether Monroe would be a worthwhile
experience for me. I felt "drawn" there, however, and signed-up.
It was great. I didn't learn anything new in terms of techniques, but I was
able to talk with folks who had similar experiences, "legitimize" and get
names for states with which I was already familiar, meet some super people
with similar interests, and have a good retreat.
When I was younger, I was in a Catholic seminary for eight years. During
that time, we always made two retreats a year. I have missed those periods
of reflection, sometimes desperately. Monroe was better than most retreats
I attended. And that is a tremendous compliment to the Monroe program.
I got to have one-on-one time with Joe McMoneagle. I also had plenty of
time to discuss things with the facilitators.
I unreservedly recommend Monroe Institute courses to everyone.
Jerry
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/560
15:06:42
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hello Greg...thanx for the understanding and insightful words..hahaha
Gene..
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Monroe Institute -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/561
15:06:51
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< I attended Monroe's Gateway Program in November of 1996. I have had OBEs
since I was seventeen years old. (Now I'm 45.) And spontaneously began
remote viewing about a year later. >>
.... woooowwww Jerry,
Hi! Quite a talented guy.... :-)
Will you share some more experiences/stories with us?
Did something trigger the OBEs or did you just realize you were having them?
I had them up till about 7 years of age, then they became less and less,
or.. :-) ... I recalled them less and less. As a child, I figured they were
just a
natural part of the sleeptime, which, come to think of it I guess thats just
what they are :-)
~Terri~
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/562
15:07:02
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> Hello Greg...thanx for the understanding and insightful words..hahaha
> Gene..
Anytime, man! I just hope that the others on the list can grasp (as do
I), that beneath that pugnacious, belligerent, callous exterior, beats
a heart of pure gold.
A fellow overlord of compassion,
Greg
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/563
15:07:15
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Amidst the Lyn Gene hoohah of the mighty stags ;-) there were these gems.
> It is true that I did
>better in CRV, and that I prefer it to ERV any day.
Why Lyn, can you explain please?
>However, there are
>some strengths which ERV has to complement CRV's weaknesses, and I have
>worked both quite extensively.
Would you like to expand on these strengths and weaknesses, please Lyn.
OK, guys, time out's over, back to it.
In Friendship and Light. MaryD
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/564
15:07:23
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< OK, guys, time out's over, back to it. >>
Sorry to disappoint you...my comments to Lyn from this point on will either
not occur or will be directed to him in person...no sightseeing this time
folks...
Gene..
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/565
15:07:33
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Interestingly enough, in one makeshift RV experimentation I did a long while
ago...the viewer was given a target of Mars surface...Although, he didn't
"hit" the target...the gestalt pointed at Army, War..and so forth... at
first glance, I dumped the session. After a few days I thought about
it...it turns out that Mars is the mythological planet of War. Although,
surface area was the target... the viewer seemed to have tapped into Mars
mythological gestalt.
electrix
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
recent debate -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/566
15:07:40
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Too bad you are closing out the discussion with Lynn, G.K. It has been a
very interesting and illuminating exchange. The kind of thing one likes
to see on a list like this. No harm done.
Sincerely,
Bill
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
recent debate -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/567
15:07:51
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< Too bad you are closing out the discussion with Lynn, G.K. It has been a
very interesting and illuminating exchange. The kind of thing one likes
to see on a list like this. No harm done. >>
Call it the arrogance of the old unit but when we disagree we disagree to each
other...we have gone through things most folks can only imagine...and
frankly...its between Lyn and myself...
Gene..
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/568
15:08:01
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<< After a few days I thought about
it...it turns out that Mars is the mythological planet of War. Although,
surface area was the target... the viewer seemed to have tapped into Mars
mythological gestalt. >>
I would come up with another impression / analysis of the comments concerning
Mars and the analogy of war...I will not comment on this again so do not come
back to me...I will simply state what I witnessed once and that is it...
Some of the viewers from the old unit and some of my students when given Mars
as a target have come up with essentially the same results...the presence of a
ruined fortress site on the face of Mars...destruction to all equipment and
inhabitants...remains are still there and in some cases they seem to be still
giving off energy or even working. The site destruction would most certainly
give off a strong impression of war...much more so than the very abstract
concept of Mars as the Greek (or was it Roman) God of war...which would be so
obscure as to be absolutely dripping in AOL...
thats it...no further comments...no further questions answered on this
issue...
gene...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/569
15:08:16
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> first glance, I dumped the session. After a few days I thought about
> it...it turns out that Mars is the mythological planet of War. Although,
> surface area was the target... the viewer seemed to have tapped into Mars
> mythological gestalt.
>
> electrix
Reminds me of a target given to me right after I got back from Paul's
class. It was a
penny. My session data centered around a small stage / audience / lights
etc. My accomplice
wondered if it was an attachment to Lincoln and his assasination. These
stretches of the
imagination are part of the problem with evaluation of sessions. I have
been reviewing
my practice sessions and swear that there are all kinds of sessions
where the data could be swapped
between targets and the same evaluation would be made. Maybe this is
more common going only through
S-3 practice.
It seems that a session with very little data could apply to many
targets and also, one with a lot
of data could apply to several targets because of the variety of data.
One odd circumstance: In my target pool are several photos that my
mother-in-law took several years ago
during a vacation in Europe. I have "pulled" all of these targets at
least once over the last year
and never have come close to describing them.
On the other hand.....I have one target that I have pulled 3 times and
each time considered it a hit.
It does wonders for my batting average. :)
Rich
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/570
15:08:28
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> thats it...no further comments...no further questions answered on this
> issue...
> gene...
My kind of story......I head for the pretzels but enjoy them immensely.
I just finished
re-reading Schnabel's book and was surprised at all the references in it
to ET/UFO experiences
attachen to RV and RVers. It didnt register the first time I read it.
Anyway, Ed Dames is still updating the world on the "awakining" Martians
and he and Courtney Brown
long ago evidently went on to the next taskings.....Martians/present
location......etc. :)
Rich
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Please Invite -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/571
15:08:42
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi all,
I just thought I'd make a public spectacle of myself with my latest
RV session and 3rd attempt to get into S-4.
I was certain that I was at a beach. Must have been wishfull thinking
from the weather. The target is more appropo to the recent weather.
Take a peek for grins at
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Rampart/3843/
Rich
PS: Site is obviously under construction.
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/572
15:08:58
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Thanks for the hypothetical feedback. Your comment is noted...I suppose the
future
will eventually disclose its event.
electrix
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Don Bradley on "Sightings" -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/573
15:09:12
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
On the July 29th "Sightings" radio program, Don Bradley made
assertions that German psychics who practiced Satanic rituals etc. (
Operation Paper clip ) were transferred to Menlo Park and SRI with the
intent of initiating the remote viewing program.
He also proffers allegations ( 2 hours and 27 minutes into the
program ) that Remote Viewing tapes ( he states that he has purchased
all of them ), have been adulterated with intentional, subliminal
messages and changes in the Theta band to ostensibly subjugate and
control those listeners.
I am interested in comments and observations on both these
allegations not only as a neophyte remote viewer, but also as a
purchaser of several remote viewing and theta entrainment audio and
video tapes.
The charges that he makes are quite serious and his diatribe on the
genesis of remote viewing reflect negatively on the the RV community.
stargate : Message: [stargate]
mars.. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/574
15:09:23
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Yeah..know what you mean on stretching the information. I must add,
though, I am very impartial to esoteric data since I like to be grounded
more in reality.
I would like to supplement my comment that the viewers, one a lucid
dreamer and the other an authentic clairvoyant (she had to pass my
stringent test), both got impression of war, equipment and soldiers on
the surface. She was more descriptive than the other.
Then again some people long ago thought the Moon was made of cheese...
electrix
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/575
15:09:33
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Gene
Not a question. But your 'mars' rv 'tracks' with one done by our group in 77.
Bevy J
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Don Bradley on "Sightings" -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/576
15:09:45
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
I can't claim that I know if the story is true or not...Mr. Bradley would
have to come up with some substantiating detail supporting information to
discredit the entities involved. This posses the question though ....
whether he is discrediting the PEOPLE in the community or the PRACTICE of
Remote Viewing. If it is the latter, for sure it his dire to find out this
man's background.
Of course, there is the conspiracy theory of individuals connected to
Intelligence going out and forming their own "satanic practices." That
wouldn't be unlike MK-Ultra and the LSD program...so it pays to keep one's
eye open at all times.
I will tell you this though...I KNOW the Theta band is subject to both
positive and negative influence. I recently wrote on Steve's BB and earlier
stargate mailing list regarding this same topic. People who are messing
around at that brainwave level need be cautious. It also applies to the
benign Meditation practice. I am not the only one with this theory...dig up
April 9 interview with Mr. Targ and Ms. Katra in Sightings...he mentions in
that interview about Distant Stearing as pseudo-hypnosis through video and
test that have been performed on its validity. The equation: Belief
+Attention + Intention = Activates Physiology. Later in the program Jane
Katra mentioned the Theta principle which supplements my findings on this
same issue.
You may check out a transcript interview (Not Sightings) at:
http://www.talkcity.com/religions/transcripts/targkatra0312.html
Read Ana Wise book on "The High Performance Mind" to learn more about
biofeedback, and specifically what she has observed at the Theta range with
her Mind Mirror biofeedback device.
I hope this helps you to sort out the bullshit from the facts more
rationality.
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Don Bradley on "Sightings" -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/577
15:09:59
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<<
The charges that he makes are quite serious and his diatribe on the
genesis of remote viewing reflect negatively on the the RV community.
>>
His comments are not worth commenting upon....as for reflecting negatively on
the RV community...Oh well....you have believers and non-believers...and
rarely will one change to the other side...so why bother...
Gene..
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/578
15:10:18
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<<
Gene
Not a question. But your 'mars' rv 'tracks' with one done by our group in 77.
Bevy J >>
I can't tell you how elated and fulfilled that makes me feel...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
mars.. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/579
15:10:27
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Regarding the Mars thread, back in the spring I was tasked with a
coordinate from a colleague on the internet. I did the session using CRV
stages 1-3 and discovered the target to be a scene that resembled the
Valley of Fire (AOL) in Nevada, high cliffs, dry, red, where water once
cascaded down to a valley floor, consisting of mud pools and hot springs.
The colleague informed me that the coordinate referred to "Mars in the
past".
Kind regards
Angela Thompson Smith
The Inner Vision Research Institute
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/580
15:10:41
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
One problem with RVing the future that is the possibility of mutiple
futures. Things like lotteries are going to be difficult or impossible
if multiple future lines exist because truly ramdom events would become
largely unpredictable even if you knew all the present information
possible in some cosmic matrix. Truly random events would eventually be
effected by such small changes in variables that it would involve
quantum changes, and thus become even theoretically unpredictable.
However, RVers should be able to predict events that would be likely in
most or all time lines, which could be just as lucrative as lotteries.
For instance I work with telomeres and aging, and collaborate with a
company ( GERN) that has patents on an enzyme called telomerase, and has
shown that cells transfected ( by viral transfer) with their recombinant
telomerase enzyme will grow forever without aging (unlike normal cells,
which stop growing and become "senescent" after 50 or so doublings).
Therefore, a possibility exists that the company will develope drugs
that prolong life based on Telomerase. If so, this small company would
skyrocket in price and investors make a fortune. Now it may be that no
drugs can ever be found that safely prolong lifespan using
telomerase...or it may turn out that there are...but it is not random it
IS either a possibility or it is not in all time lines. This type of
target should be possible for an RVer to determine. Similarly, many
other hi-tech startups are based on an idea that may or may not work,
and the uncertainty forces down the stock price, as soon as the idea is
proven the price will skyrocket, or if disproven go to 0.
My question is whether anyone has done this kind of future targeting
and if so what are the success ratios. Please lets start a separate
string for the ethics of this, and keep this string for whether it's
possible.
Regards,
Bill
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/581
15:10:51
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>... If so, this small company would
>skyrocket in price and investors make a fortune. Now it may be that no
>drugs can ever be found that safely prolong lifespan using
>telomerase...or it may turn out that there are...but it is not random it
>IS either a possibility or it is not in all time lines. This type of
>target should be possible for an RVer to determine.
There are other issues, though, such as:
Corporate espionage, start-up funding, direction of research, content of
research, even the credibility and knowledge of the workers in the company.
IMHO, you just couldn't say with any degree of accuracy whether this
company would make money or not.
Jerry
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
RV Online for AOL -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/582
15:11:05
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
If anyone is on AOL, click here New Age
Message Boards then go to MIND and Remote Viewing.
>>Braden
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/583
15:11:15
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
TRUE Jerry,
But for the sake of argument let's assume that those eventualities are
all reasonably well disposed of. In fact at Geron I know they have very
good scientists and a competant administration. If the potential for
such drugs exist they will probably find them. Also, even if the
president steals the funds, or the plant gets hit by a meteorite, an
investor would have a big advantage knowing the product was possible,
and a large number of potential futures (if not all) would reflect this.
And so would scientists doing research in that area, whose funding
depends eventually on just that feasibility.
Best Regards,
Bill
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
ideograms etc. -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/584
15:11:29
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
(snip)
To paraphrase, the ideogram is more than a set creature, less than a totally
random beast, and just a step in the majority of structured RV processes
available. It shouldn't be made out to be as complex as some people would have
it be, nor as simple as others would in turn. It is, a completely open arena
(and apparently malleable) in the RV sciences.
<<<<
Excellent summary!!!
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
----
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Figure eights -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/585
15:11:43
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>>better in CRV, and that I prefer it to ERV any day.
>Why Lyn, can you explain please?
I think it is probably because I am too anal retentive. I really like the
highly structured environment of CRV.
Don't get me wrong... I enjoy ERV very much. The few times the I monitored
ERV sessions, I realized how much more work it is on the monitor than CRV
is. However, there is much less work for the viewer doing ERV than CRV.
As far as the viewer is concerned, there is no apparent structure. In
reality, there is a lot of structure, but the monitor is responsible for
keeping the viewer in it. In fact, the monitor has an almost impossible
job, while the viewer is just lying there having a good old time,
visualizing away, getting perceptions and mumbling them out.
For the viewer, ERV is sexier, more entertaining, more fun, and much easier
than CRV ever could be. For the monitor... well, it takes a special
person. (BTW: Gene is one of those special persons who are excellent at
monitoring ERV. In many ways, I feel about him the same as I feel about
Skip Atwater... that here is one of our natural national treasures. Like I
said before, we bicker a lot, but when it comes to getting down and getting
the work done, he's one of the best. He's one of only three people I would
now trust to monitor me in an ERV session.)
Lyn said:
>>However, there are some strengths which ERV has to complement CRV's
>>weaknesses, and I have worked both quite extensively.
To which MaryD replied:
>Would you like to expand on these strengths and weaknesses, please Lyn.
Well, you already know that CRV's biggest embarrassment is numbers. Second
to this is probably the acquisition of names, words, etc. >>>With a good
ERV monitor<<<, these aren't nearly as much of a problem in ERV as in CRV.
I don't remember whether it was Skip, Liam, or Gene (the three whom I
ultimately came to trust as THE top-rate ERV monitors) who ran me on an ERV
session once in which I was able to get the name and rank off a military
commander's desktop nameplate / pen set. The name and rank were later
confirmed as being correct. That would be a miserably hard thing to do in
CRV, and would probably take several sessions.
That is just one way CRV and ERV compliment each other. There are a lot of
others. That's one of the reasons we used both methods.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Monroe experience -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/586
15:12:38
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
At 11:54 AM 7/29/98 EDT, -Terri- wrote:
>My 2 cents....
>Well, having completed several Monroe programs, then having Gene 'find' me
>and open my eyes to the awesomeness (freedom) of remote viewing, well I can
>say I will always be a Monroer first and an RVer second. I think you will
find
>that a Monroe grad, especially, an Explore 27 grad. will make one hell of a
>knock your socks off viewer (if one ever comes to you)
Actually, several have come to me, and I am a Monroe grad, myself. (Headed
for the Heartline course, next month).
Good catch!!! I was guilty of being way too provencial in my answer. The
original question was whether or not the Monroe course helps in "remote
viewing" (broad term). I wound up addressing the much narrower term of
"Controlled Remote Viewing", in which it hasn't been useful much at all
>>during the session<< or even in session preparation for "cool down".
Your comment shows that there is a much broader answer. That broader
answer would seem to be that the Monroe course can help very much, but I
would add that you probably must stick to the same general style, such as
ERV or OBE.
Whether or not >>>having taken<<< the Monroe course sets a person up
mentally, emotionally and spiritually for becoming a "better" "remote
viewer" addresses a totally different question than the narrow one I was
answering. It is also probably a moot question. How can you take someone
who has not been through the course and say with any reliability that they
would have been better had they taken it? Also, how can you take someone
who HAS been through the course and say that they would not have been as
good a remote viewer if they hadn't taken it? You can't really say either
with great reliability, after the fact. For example, who can say with
absolute certainty that you would not have been one hell of a knock your
socks off viewer, even without taking the Monroe course? Maybe it is just
your natural talent and would have come out either way. There is no way to
ever know, now.
The Monroe Institute has a "remote viewing" tape they put out, which is
supposed to help you do their style of remote viewing. It is a style which
has been gained from a lot of studying Joe McMoneagle in his work. That
has got to be of pretty good value.
So, let me change my answer to be much more specific about it, with the
very specific caveat that it is only an answer to one part of the overall
"remote viewing" picture:
The Monroe >>>tapes<<< and >>>exercises<<< learned at the Monroe course
>>>at the level this person would start at<<< have not proven to be an
>>>in session<<< aid specifically to working a >>>CRV<<< session.
Other people, like yourself, have more input to other forms of remote
viewing, and how effective other-than-basic levels of study at the Monroe
institute would be toward those forms of remote viewing.
I jumped to the assumption that the person who asked the question had not
gone to Monroe yet, and if told that the Monroe course were a boon to
remote viewing, might attend the first course hoping to come out a
confirmed remote viewer. Like I say, parochial thinking on my part.
I'm very glad you came back with this comment, since it shows that there
are other considerations, and other levels of Monroe training, and that
there is more to this question than each person, from their own singular
point of view can answer. Good input. Thanks.
For me, the bottom line is still that I would recommend the Monroe courses
to anyone.
Lyn Buchanan, Problems Solutions Innovations
37 Camino Ranchitos, Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 (505) 437-8285
Check out our web page at http://www.crviewer.com
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/587
15:12:50
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
>There are other issues, though, such as:
>Corporate espionage, start-up funding, direction of research, content of
>research, even the credibility and knowledge of the workers in the company.
>IMHO, you just couldn't say with any degree of accuracy whether this
>company would make money or not.
>
>Jerry
I may be missing something, but I don't understand the problem. Surely
if an RVer sets out to view the future, as it turns out, in his or her
own timeline....then that's what they'll get.
--
Regards,
Glyn
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/588
15:12:58
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi Bill,
I hear you. But I still think that RVing the future is beset with unforseen
circumstances. Heck, even if Lee Iacocca was the President, an RV on the
future would be inherently inaccurate because there are no controls.
Without controls and confirmation you are just whistling in the wind.
However, on a personal level, if I felt confident in such session results,
I'd probably trust my instincts. But I would never indicate in a public
forum that RVing the future is accurate. Just taint so.
Jerry
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/589
15:13:06
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hello Glyn,
AS you can see from Jerry's response below, and previous posts by most
of the other remote viewers (that I have seen) indicate that targeting
the future is very difficult if not impossible. So the question is, can
that difficulty be reduced by asking questions that are more or less
predetermined. I.E. drugs for aging based on telomerase can be made or
they can't be made. That possibility exists or doesn't exist in any
future. Can RV determine such possibilities. Or is even this too much.
Regards,
Bill
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Don Bradley on "Sightings" -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/590
15:13:19
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
I have no information on subversion' of Theta.
Do know, however, that KOMAR, who holds many Guinness World Records for
supporting tremendous weights on his body while on a bed of nails (really) has
been tested in laboratories from every imaginable USA University to Red
China's PSI labs; and has been found to utilize a Theta brainwave state while
doing some of these things.
KOMAR is Vernon Craig, has co-authored a book with Brad Steiger called Life
Without Pain. (libraries can get it) Has the ability to instantly stop
bleeding and in a few hours completely heal deep cuts and gashes (personally
observed many times') in this Theta state.
This is the reason he is of such interest to the scientific communities
worldwide. I have known him since late 1960's. No matter what CSICOP says, he
is the real thing.
I will be doing the Sightings Show again on Aug 13 and perhaps will get into
the brainwave theories, at least to some degree.
Theta level has been exhibited in stages of deep meditation as well as in
some states of emotion such as total rage.
Bevy J
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/591
15:13:33
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Jerome Pople wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I hear you. But I still think that RVing the future is beset with unforseen
> circumstances. Heck, even if Lee Iacocca was the President, an RV on the
> future would be inherently inaccurate because there are no controls.
I don't get it. If a person can predict exact details of an event that
won't happen for several years... then it happens exactly as foretold...
then the person rv's the future...
It's the concept that everything must have "controls" that is
"inherently inaccurate".... like trying to put the ocean in a bottle.
Trypper
----
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Don Bradley on "Sightings" -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/592
15:13:47
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> I have no information on subversion' of Theta.
>
> Do know, however, that KOMAR, who holds many Guinness World Records for
>supporting tremendous weights on his body while on a bed of nails (really)
has
>been tested in laboratories from every imaginable USA University to Red
>China's PSI labs; and has been found to utilize a Theta brainwave state while
>doing some of these things.
[snip]
> Theta level has been exhibited in stages of deep meditation as well as in
>some states of emotion such as total rage.
Theta frequencies occur naturally in the brain under many different
conditions. Anyone who does EEG work sees them *regularly* in *every*
person studied. They are an indication that the associated area of the
brain is idling rather than actively processing. Theta is very prevalent
in brain damaged and stroke patients because areas of the cortex have been
compromised. Theta occurs often in attention deficit disorder because the
neurons that control attention are underdeveloped.
There is no justification for giving Theta as such any excess meaning
beyond that. The switch is simple turned off in a given cortical center.
R. Michael O'Bannon, Ph.D.
Corporate and Clinical Psychologist
42 Lenox Pointe
Atlanta, GA 30324
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Fwd: FYI - Y2K situation -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/593
15:14:15
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
comments?
Fri Jul 31, 1998 7:38 pm
Show Message Option
View Source
Use Fixed Width Font
Unwrap Lines
USPsiSquad@...
Send Email Send Email
*
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600-----------*
From: Doc
Subject: Re: Joan - a calm voice in the wilderness
> Doc, your approach is sensible and do-able for everyone. Thank you. I'm
> still not sure folks like Gary North are making things sound worse than
they
> will be, or if he is painting a possible terrifying scenario.
The *potential* scope and nature of Y2K impacts is virtually incomprehensible.
The effects could range from delivery delays for food to groceries and
restaurants, to blips in traffic systems and police communications systems.
The essential point, though, is to reduce the guesswork and worry factors
through dialogue, by calling your PC manufacturers, software vendors, banks,
credit card companies and vendors, then communicating about the results of
those dialogues openly and calmly.
I can email a best-case/worst case scenario to any interested parties on
request, with specific examples of industries and services/goods affected,
though this is *strictly* a semi-educated wild guess.
> it occurred to me that it might be a sensible idea if I were to get all my
> stock certificates sent to me in case of crashes at my stockbroker. What
> your reaction to this idea?
The securities industry can be a peculiar domain for this subject. Prime
players with automated systems (in the US) include depositories, custodians,
transfer agents, paying agents, dividend reinvestment agents, etc. The
minimalist approach suggests keeping hard copy records of all ownership,
registration, custodianship and transactions in a very safe place in your
home.
While it might be tempting to hold the certificate(s) physically, it doesn't
guarantee access to transactions if the underlying system is down.
> Also, I'm thinking of purchasing an inhome safe - vaults too run on
> computers. What do the rest of you think?
At the risk of oversimplifying the matter, I simply wouldn't keep anything
in a
vault that I might need access to between 6/99 and 2/00. And I would pay very
close attention to Y2K related news from now until 6/99 to develop an
*incremental* approach to Y2K preparation. This approach reduces abrupt
panic-shifts in market activity which directly affect all of us.
> **** Re: Subject Y2K Gimme info, Data, Fact -- Ed Wood
> ...some potentially serious issues developing not only in the former USSR,
> but possibly in other third world countries.
The international dynamics of Y2K are especially complicated guesswork. But if
you think through the supply and information chains (for goods, services and
data that affect you) one step at a time, you'll see how shipping,
transportation and communication (private, corp, gov and even military) could
be affected in isolated, periodic and intermittent ways for quite a while.
Doc Hammel
OPSEC
http://opsec.net
doc@...
*
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600-----------*
HUGS FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS! / \ ()
We are so lucky to have you for / \ ()
FRIENDS and FAMILY. / * * \||
Joan and Bill in St. Louis | |||
xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Don Bradley on "Sightings" -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/594
15:14:31
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
R. Michael O'Bannon wrote:
> At 07:57 PM 7/31/98 -0400, you wrote:
> [snip]
>
> There is no justification for giving Theta as such any excess meaning
> beyond that. The switch is simple turned off in a given cortical center.
>
> R. Michael O'Bannon, Ph.D.
"Theta" has become the RV holy grail or buzz word. Thetas relevance in Rv is
only
at the handshake point between low alpha and high theta where the primary and
sub
consciousness aspects of mind exchange control.
To the disciplined mind with a clear intent and query this window of opportunity
affords access to clear target data without the pesky interference of either
deductive reasoning or imagination.
Depending on the stamina of the viewer or skill of his/her monitor how long they
can maintain stability in that very small window and collect congruant target
data. If the viewer falls asleep.. session is over.
Anything one does not understand appears as magic. Just because this has been
tested and labeled, does not mean it takes any less hard work to effectively
employ the phenomena. Throwing the name around does not mean the person using
the
term understands or can utilize it's potential anymore than a tourist looking at
the weights Mr. "I'll be back" Swartzinegger (sp) lifts regularly to maintain
his
physique. To some they are just very big paper weights, to most theta is just
a
natural untapped state of being that occurs as you fall asleep.
Aloha Yaana
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/595
15:14:48
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
<<
I don't get it. If a person can predict exact details of an event that
won't happen for several years... then it happens exactly as foretold...
then the person rv's the future...
>>
OK...let me be a bit "parochial" as Lyn says....stick with me here, this gets
a bit esoteric...The future has not happened (duh!!! hahaha) therefore it has
not happened yet...(double duh!!!!!....). Since it has not happened but is
still "viewable" by the Remote Viewer, then it has to be presumed that even
after it is viewed IT IS NOT SET..it is not engraved in the book of time and
cannot be changed...that only occurs in the past..you cannot change the past
since it IS ENGRAVED...So, if a viewer takes the gamble to view the future
all they are looking at is a future which is still forming...still existing in
a broad series of fractals (Paul Smith taught me that term)...If you simply
view it...and do not do anything which would impact upon the future which you
viewed, then it is likely to occur that way (unless of course any number of a
billion billion other things do not occur which may drive us to another
fractal in the fabric of time. If, however, you become one of the billion
billion little beating butterflies that choose to attempt to change the
future, it most definitely will change...i.e.. trying to view the lottery
numbers from the future then trying to play them....on the other hand, if you
viewed yourself actually winning in the future, then if none of the other
billion billion variables attempt to change the future, chances are that you
will actually win...of course that presumes you know exactly when it is in the
future that you are viewing and where...you may only think you are viewing the
Power Ball from last week...but in reality you may be viewing the lottery in
Rome, Italy in the year 2001 after Y2K and the collapse of economies world
wide...Yep, you guessed it...you won 268M..but it was in Lira...and Lira from
the year 2001 which are worth about 268K per dollar...(just like the current
Turkish Lira...check today's newspaper..I am not lying...)...so instead of
winning the makings of a Kings Ransom...you just won enough for a day at
Disneyworld...The future is tricky business...don't take it seriously...
Gene...
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/596
15:14:59
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
At 11:17 PM 7/31/98 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Glynn,
No, actually without any way to assess the info, there is no certainty.
Things may happen which affect the outcome which a viewer is not aware.
Don't forget, time is not a continuum, but rather a parallel dimension.
Jerry
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/597
15:15:12
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Hi Trypper,
Let me explain again.
In an RV situation, a target is assigned by a third party. The Viewer and
the Monitor (usually) don't know the target. Accuracy is assessed by the
third party. If the monitor knows the target, he/she may tip-off the viewer
with subconscious cues. That's a no-no.
Your own AOL of the future is a roadblock as well.
Now, Clairvoyance is a different thing entirely. Seeing the future has been
done and is currently being done by gifted individuals. But, it is not RV.
"Psychic seeing" is not RV and RV is not "psychic seeing". RV is a protocol
driven procedure used by individuals for viewing targets - it is not a way
to view the future. Sometimes people do, and that's OK. But, it is
inaccurate and uncontrolled. In other words, you could, and most likely
will, get burned.
Jerry
stargate : Message: [stargate]
Theta -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/598
15:15:23
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
R. Michael O'Bannon wrote:
> Theta frequencies occur naturally in the brain under many different
> conditions. Anyone who does EEG work sees them *regularly* in *every*
>
> person studied. They are an indication that the associated area of
> the
> brain is idling rather than actively processing. Theta is very
> prevalent
> in brain damaged and stroke patients because areas of the cortex have
> been
> compromised. Theta occurs often in attention deficit disorder because
> the
> neurons that control attention are underdeveloped.
Precisely, and let's not forget that's where subliminal advertisement
messages are embedded while we are not paying ATTENTION. The state, as
oppose to the frequency, is what I am directing this issue towards. It
is an open state of receptivity and activity against the body, since
that is hypothetically where the subliminal messages lies to affect the
conscious decisions of its victim. It is also the "area" where
repressed memories are likely to be activated if abruptly accessed,
which could trigger physiological reaction.
In a recent documentary called The Dream Files, it was noted that there
are several stages a night a person goes though in accessing theta state
(since it must seek Delta to be in REM state). The first stage is
usually of the theta encounter the person goes through disturbing
experiences during sleep, only to mellow out during the night (in fact,
every 90 minutes or so we are cycling through the state levels through
out the day). Furthermore, if the 1st stage "loops,"...meaning, if we do
not consummate the 1st stage requirement, it triggers nightmares or we
wake up at the "wrong side of the bed."
Certainly, theta is a natural state. It is natural state because the
conscious mind seeks to avoid the area at all cost as a protective
mechanism. However, if we willfully seek to enter or actively disturb
this area, we are increasing the chance of contacting unwanted
experience or being influenced. Note...I am saying that if we WILLFULLY
seek to engage that area we MAY trigger unwanted reactions. Furthermore,
at any time of the day our theta receptivity IS open for subliminal
messages...any study in this area will tell you that having no attention
on the advertisement will get through into that open receptivity to
affect our taste of that product or the condition.
> There is no justification for giving Theta as such any excess meaning
> beyond that. The switch is simple turned off in a given cortical
> center.
>
Yes, as long as we are ATTENTIVE. Although, on the later statement I
have seen no studies that correlates the physiological anatomy of the
brain correlating or being the CAUSE of brain wave frequency. So,
whether there is "justification." is a question of how attentive one
wishes to be.
electrix
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/599
15:15:53
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
> view it...and do not do anything which would impact upon the future which you
> viewed, then it is likely to occur that way (unless of course any number of a
> billion billion other things do not occur which may drive us to another
> fractal in the fabric of time. If, however, you become one of the billion
> billion little beating butterflies that choose to attempt to change the
> future, it most definitely will change...
Not necessarily... you could interact with the future potential and it
could still turn out the way you "saw" it. You could alter the course
of events yourself... change the fractal just a little bit.
>of course that presumes you know exactly when it is in the
> future that you are viewing and where...you may only think you are >viewing
the> Power Ball from last week...but in reality you may be >viewing the lottery
in Rome, Italy in the year 2001 after Y2K and the >collapse of economies world
That doesn't make sense... if you are there... if you are viewing it..
you should be able to figure out when and where you are. There should
be some clues in the environment... don't you think? ... oh.. I get
it.. the coordinates thing.. you guys only see the specific thing you
coordinate on.. is that it? You don't 'see' the whole thing?
>..The future is tricky business...don't take it seriously...
> Gene...
> ----
Hey!! you're right.. don't take anything seriously.. :-)
Trypper
----
stargate : Message: Re: [stargate]
Rving the future -
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stargate/message/600
15:16:06
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-StarGate_group-000501-000600---------
Jerome Pople wrote:
>
> At 11:17 PM 7/31/98 +0100, you wrote:
> Hi Glynn,
>
> No, actually without any way to assess the info, there is no certainty.
> Things may happen which affect the outcome which a viewer is not aware.
That doesn't make sense to me either... either the info validates itself
or it doesn't... if you rv the future and it happens.. then you actually
saw it and it is validated.. it happened..
If it doesn't happen, then you didn't really see anything... you just
imagined it.... or better yet.. you changed it.
|